Student resources

# A quick-start guide to the statistical analysis of political attitudes and behaviors

Code and instructions to analyze the Eurobarometer using R.

# Overview

The purpose of this document is to get you up and running with (potentially) professional-level, statistical analysis of political data, quickly. It will automatically import the Eurobarometer Trend File (1970-2002), a large survey dataset asking individuals across European countries a wide variety of questions in many different years. This document is intended to rapidly “bootstrap” individuals with zero programming knowledge into being able to conduct fairly sophisticated anlayses on a wide variety of political questions. In particular, this is intended especially for undergraduate political science students with no background in computer programming, interested in questions about political attitudes/behaviors, who wish to challenge themselves and build their skills/experience with quantitative data analysis. You can use this as a springboard to learning how to use R independently, but this document is not intended to teach you that. It’s a purely practical guide to jumpstart your capacity to produce analyses; everything else is up to you.

If you find this fun/interesting/useful/exciting, then you might want to actually learn the language a bit more. For excellent, easy, free interactive tutorials try: https://www.datacamp.com/courses/free-introduction-to-r and/or http://tryr.codeschool.com/

# Setup

- Download and install R (it’s free.)
- Download and install RStudio (it’s free).
- Find and download the Eurobarometer codebook for your reference
- Open RStudio

R is the programming language and RStudio is the application we will actually open, see, and do our work in.

- Load this starter script I have written for you.

After opening RStudio, go to File > New File > R script and copy-paste that starter script into the new script file. Or download that that starter script as a .R file and then go to File > Open File and select that .R file. You can just select all of the text in that script and click “Run” (or command-Enter on a Mac), to rapidly have your computer do some basic data wrangling tasks and estimate, as well as visualize, the relationship between media exposure and the probability that individuals in the UK would vote in the 1994 European Parliament elections. To do your own original analysis of something totally different, you can peruse the codebook of the Eurobarometer data and copy/tinker with the code in my script to apply it to your own variables of interest. You can also choose different countries in different years, but in your first analyses, focus on one country in one year because things get statistically complicated when you have multiple countries and multiple years.

# Run the script and voilà

```
### Starter script for analyzing the Eurobarometer Trend data (1970-2002).
### Outline:
### 1. Import the dataset straight from the web
### 2. Isolate variables of interest and clean them up
### 3. Estimate a regression model of what makes people turnout for EP elections
### Download packages we're going to use
### Remove the "#" in the following three lines if you have not already installed these
# install.packages("ggplot2")
# install.packages("foreign")
require(ggplot2)
require(foreign)
require(Zelig)
### Define the URL where the dataset is located
url<-"https://www.dropbox.com/s/5bdhel8l7c5r59z/eurobarometer_trends.dta?raw=1"
### Read the dataset straight from the web, name the dataframe "data"
data <- read.dta(url)
### Variable "mediause" asks how much the respondent relies on the media.
summary(data$mediause) # Get a simple summary
```

```
## VERY HIGH high low VERY LOW dk na inap
## 166824 128310 71049 19534 2514 445 5612
## NA's
## 740096
```

```
data$mediause[data$mediause=="dk"]<-NA # Let's consider all the "dk" answerers as missing (NA)
data$mediause[data$mediause=="na"]<-NA # Let's consider all the "dk" as missing (NA)
data$mediause[data$mediause=="inap"]<-NA # Let's consider all the "inap" as missing (NA)
data$mediause<-factor(data$mediause) # this removes unused levels
levels(data$mediause)<-c("Very high", "High", "Low", "Very low") # Clean up the messy names of the levels
data$medianum<-as.numeric(data$mediause) # convert the categories to a numerical scale (cheating a bit!)
data$medianum<-(4 - data$medianum) # Subtract from 4 to make it more intuitive (higher number = more likely to vote)
### Variable "particip" asks respondent how likely they are to vote in the EP elections.
summary(data$particip)
```

```
## CERTAINLY YES PROBABLY YES PROBABLY NOT CERTAINLY NOT depends
## 86318 37950 13719 16375 6192
## DK,NA inap NA's
## 10030 7319 956481
```

```
data$particip[data$particip=="DK,NA"]<-NA
data$particip[data$particip=="depends"]<-NA
data$particip[data$particip=="inap"]<-NA
data$particip<-factor(data$particip)
levels(data$particip)<-c("Certainly yes", "Probably yes", "Probably not", "Certainly not")
data$participnum<-as.numeric(data$particip) # convert the categories to a numerical scale (cheating a bit!)
data$participnum<-(4 - data$participnum) # Subtract from 4 to make it more intuitive (higher number = more likely to vote)
data$particip <- ifelse(data$participnum>=2, 1, 0) # Collapse into a no/yes, 0/1, binary version
### Variable "income" asks the respondent's income level.
summary(data$income)
```

```
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's
## 1.00 5.00 8.00 29.28 96.00 99.00 52308
```

```
### Variable "polint" asks the respondent's political interest generally.
summary(data$polint)
```

```
## A GREAT DEAL TO SOME EXTENT NOT MUCH NOT AT ALL DK,NA
## 12311 36657 35622 24101 968
## inap NA's
## 2583 1022142
```

```
data$polint[data$polint=="DK,NA"]<-NA
data$polint[data$polint=="inap"]<-NA
data$polint<-factor(data$polint)
levels(data$polint)<-c("A great deal", "To some extent", "Not much", "Not at all")
data$polintnum<-as.numeric(data$polint) # convert the categories to a numerical scale (cheating a bit!)
data$polintnum<-(4 - data$polintnum) # Subtract from 4 to make it more intuitive (higher number = more likely to vote)
summary(data$polintnum)
```

```
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's
## 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 2.0 3.0 1025693
```

```
### Variable "ecint3" asks the respondent's interest in EU politics.
summary(data$ecint3)
```

```
## VERY INTERESTED A LITTLE NOT AT ALL DK, NA
## 17438 39654 20800 2727
## inap NA's
## 0 1053765
```

```
data$ecint3[data$ecint3=="DK, NA"]<-NA
data$ecint3[data$ecint3=="inap"]<-NA
data$ecint3<-factor(data$ecint3)
levels(data$ecint3)<-c("Very interested", "A little", "Not at all")
data$ecint3num<-as.numeric(data$ecint3) # convert the categories to a numerical scale (cheating a bit!)
data$ecint3num<-(3 - data$ecint3num) # Subtract from 4 to make it more intuitive (higher number = more likely to vote)
summary(data$ecint3num)
```

```
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's
## 0 0 1 1 1 2 1056492
```

```
### Variable "ecint4" asks the respondent's interest in EU politics.
summary(data$ecint4)
```

```
## A GREAT DEAL TO SOME EXTENT NOT MUCH NOT AT ALL DK, NA
## 14316 48580 49690 28588 2288
## inap NA's
## 4611 986311
```

```
data$ecint4[data$ecint4=="DK, NA"]<-NA
data$ecint4[data$ecint4=="inap"]<-NA
data$ecint4<-factor(data$ecint4)
levels(data$ecint4)<-c("A great deal", "To some extent", "Not much", "Not at all")
data$ecint4num<-as.numeric(data$ecint4) # convert the categories to a numerical scale (cheating a bit!)
data$ecint4num<-(4 - data$ecint4num) # Subtract from 4 to make it more intuitive (higher number = more likely to vote)
summary(data$ecint4num)
```

```
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. NA's
## 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.3 2.0 3.0 993210
```

```
### Variable "nation1" captures the respondent's nation
summary(data$nation1)
```

```
## france belgium netherlands GERMANY-WEST
## 91414 89906 89269 91498
## italy luxembourg denmark ireland
## 92163 38459 84566 84395
## GREAT BRITAIN NORTHERN IRELAND greece spain
## 88792 25303 70266 60123
## portugal GERMANY-EAST norway finland
## 59947 49641 11989 37869
## sweden austria switzerland
## 33671 35113 0
```

```
data$gb<-ifelse(data$nation1=="GREAT BRITAIN", 1, 0)
### Variable "year" captures the year of the survey
summary(data$year)
```

```
## Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max.
## 1970 1987 1994 1992 1999 2002
```

```
##########################################################################
### Zero in on the subset of the sample relevant to your research question
##########################################################################
# Subset the data to one country in one year because having multiple countries/years gets complicated statistically
dataUK1994<-subset(data, nation1=="GREAT BRITAIN" & data$year==1994, select=c("particip", "medianum", "polintnum", "income", "nation1"))
#########################################################################
### Always do some basic visual inspection / descriptive analysis of your key variables
qplot(dataUK1994$particip) +
labs(x="Likely to vote in the EU Parliament election?")
```

```
qplot(dataUK1994$medianum) +
labs(x="Degree of media usage")
```

```
#######################################################
####### Regression analysis using the Zelig package
#######################################################
# DV is likely to vote or not likely to vote, i.e. a binary variable.
# So we need a "logit" model
model<-zelig(particip ~
income + medianum,
data=dataUK1994,
model="logit")
```

```
## How to cite this model in Zelig:
## R Core Team. 2007.
## logit: Logistic Regression for Dichotomous Dependent Variables
## in Christine Choirat, James Honaker, Kosuke Imai, Gary King, and Olivia Lau,
## "Zelig: Everyone's Statistical Software," http://zeligproject.org/
```

`summary(model)`

```
## Model:
##
## Call:
## z5$zelig(formula = particip ~ income + medianum, data = dataUK1994)
##
## Deviance Residuals:
## Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
## -1.7077 -1.4148 0.7351 0.8428 1.1639
##
## Coefficients:
## Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|)
## (Intercept) 0.234961 0.211419 1.111 0.266418
## income -0.002073 0.001648 -1.257 0.208654
## medianum 0.320133 0.087705 3.650 0.000262
##
## (Dispersion parameter for binomial family taken to be 1)
##
## Null deviance: 1220.7 on 1000 degrees of freedom
## Residual deviance: 1205.5 on 998 degrees of freedom
## (2189 observations deleted due to missingness)
## AIC: 1211.5
##
## Number of Fisher Scoring iterations: 4
##
## Next step: Use 'setx' method
```

```
x.out <- setx(model, medianum=seq(0,3,1)) # Set media to a range from its min to its max
s.out <- sim(model, x = x.out)
ci.plot(s.out,
main="Media Usage and Voting in the European Election (UK in 1994)")
```

Share this post:

Citation for this post: * RIS Citation
* * BibTeX Entry
*

Murphy, Justin. 2016. "A quick-start guide to the statistical analysis of political attitudes and behaviors," http://jmrphy.net/blog/2016/12/06/a-quick-start-guide-to-the-statistical-analysis-of-political-attitudes-and-behaviors/ (March 12, 2018).